Summary:

- The article discusses the misconception that journal indexation, such as being included in databases like Scopus or Web of Science, is a guarantee of quality for academic publications.
- It explains that indexation is primarily a measure of visibility and discoverability, not necessarily a reflection of a journal's rigorous peer review process or the quality of the research it publishes.
- The article cautions that over-reliance on journal indexation as a proxy for quality can lead to biases in the evaluation of research and researchers, and encourages a more nuanced understanding of the limitations of such metrics.