Harvard lexicon: “Kerfuffle” is what you call it when you completely botched your data but you don’t...

TL;DR


Summary:

- The article discusses a controversy surrounding a study published in the Harvard Business Review, which claimed that using a specific "lexicon" could predict a person's future earnings.
- The study was heavily criticized for its flawed methodology, including issues with the data and analysis, leading to the conclusion that the researchers "completely botched" their work.
- The article highlights the importance of transparent and rigorous scientific practices, and the need for researchers to be willing to acknowledge and correct mistakes, rather than stubbornly clinging to their original conclusions.

Like summarized versions? Support us on Patreon!