Summary:
- The article discusses concerns that judicial training on climate science may introduce bias in judges presiding over climate-related cases.
- The training, provided by the Federal Judicial Center, aims to educate judges on the scientific consensus around climate change, but critics argue it could lead to judges becoming predisposed to siding with climate change plaintiffs.
- The article notes that some legal experts believe the training program is a form of "judicial activism" and could undermine the impartiality of the courts in handling climate litigation.